Op Ed: An Open Letter to the Mainstream LGBT Movement

May 5, 2013
By

“There is no such thing as a single issue struggle because we do not live single issue lives.” – Audre Lorde

Dear Mainstream LGBT Movement,

In a recent advertisement for a local “Give Out Day” event, the organization, South Carolina Equality, asserted that only five percent of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons give money to LGBT causes. As an LGBTQ-identified person and a white ally within anti-racism movements, I take major offense with the inclusion of that statistic in the advertisement. The advertisement proves emblematic of systemic, national developments within the narrowly focused LGBT movement. Mainstream LGBT organizations like the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and South Carolina Equality need to pause and consider why LGBT persons might be unable or unwilling to financially support organizations.

In a recent ColorLines article, Imara Jones effectively encapsulates the qualms that many LGBTQ-identified persons have with the co-opting of our movement by a privileged few. More than half of LGBT people in the U.S. are women; and black Americans, Asian Americans and Latinos make up a greater proportion of those identifying as LGBT than do whites. LGBTQ-identified Americans are 30 percent more likely to have low-income jobs than the general population and are less likely to have high paying jobs than workers as a whole.

Thus, LGBTQ-identified persons may not donate to your organizations because they see mostly white cisgendered males in leadership roles. Maybe they are transgendered and are effectively ignored in a movement that privileges cisgendered folks. Maybe they are working low-wage jobs and have little to no extra income to spare. Maybe they are dismayed by the centering of marriage equality and the sidelining of issues like employment discrimination— employment discrimination against LGBTQ persons is legal in 34 states.

Contrary to what the popular media representations might have you believe, not all LGBTQ-identified persons are upwardly mobile white cisgendered males. By neglecting to undertake an intersectional approach, organizations like South Carolina Equality and HRC render large swaths of LGBTQ-identified people invisible.

Although I have limited financial resources, I have been donating small amounts to organizations like Southerners on New Ground (SONG), the National Black Justice Coalition, and Applied Research Center. These organizations, I believe, are doing really important, intersectional work on LGBTQ equity. In some cases, marriage equality is still a part of the platform, but these organizations are also working effectively on HIV/AIDS funding, employment discrimination, anti-bullying and anti-violence initiatives.

I certainly believe that same-gender couples should have access to marriage. But I wonder why we are choosing to value certain types of relationships and family structures over others. What about single parent households or multi-generational households? What are the consequences for LGBTQ couples who choose not to get married or who simply do not fit the nuclear family mold?

In closing, I would challenge the LGBTQ equity movement to reconsider its focus on marriage equality. Don’t expect critically-conscious LGBTQ persons and their allies to financially support organizations if they do not reflect the diversity of our communities and our concerns.

Sincerely,
Benjamin Fisher

_______________________________________

UntitledBenjamin Fisher has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Journalism and African Studies from Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia and is currently working on his Master of Arts in Gender Studies from Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. He recently moved back to Columbia, South Carolina to work on his long-distance thesis project, which focuses on coalition building and intersections between movements for LGBTQ justice and racial justice. He has recently signed on as a production assistant to the fabulous Cynthia Hardy for her progressive radio and television show OnPoint! With Cynthia Hardy. In his spare time, he enjoys running, writing, reading, singing Mariah Carey songs at the top of his lungs, supporting the arts, and involving himself in progressive activism.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

16 Responses to Op Ed: An Open Letter to the Mainstream LGBT Movement

  1. [...] Op Ed: An Open Letter to the Mainstream LGBT Movement. [...]

  2. [...] Op Ed: An Open Letter to the Mainstream LGBT Movement. [...]

  3. [...] Op Ed: An Open Letter to the Mainstream LGBT Movement. [...]

  4. [...] Op Ed: An Open Letter to the Mainstream LGBT Movement. [...]

  5. suzy on May 6, 2013 at 9:42 am

    No individual is “LGBT.” It is not possible to be all at once. Calling an individual “LGBT” has no meaning except except to erase.

    Many Lesbians are fed up with being made invisible by the alphabet soup of LGBT. As should be gay men. Why should Lesbian statistics be added, like some exotic herb sprinkled into the mix, only to evaporate and disappear.

    • Ben on May 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm

      I’m mostly using the alphabet soup in this op-ed because it’s the language that most people are familiar with. I agree that it is problematic. I personally prefer the term “queer liberation” and identify as “queer” because I think it’s more inclusive. But I recognize that a lot of folks are not familiar with or comfortable with that, as that term has been previously used as a pejorative.

      Some folks have even offered “gender and sexuality diversity” as an alternative. However, I reserve the right to continue utilizing “LGBTQ” until there is a consensus developed around an alternative terminology. If I utilized esoteric/inaccessible vocabulary or terminology, I would risk rendering the movement unintelligible to large swaths of people. So I’ve chosen to utilize the most accessible terminology.

  6. suzy on May 6, 2013 at 9:42 am

    No individual is “LGBT.” It is not possible to be all at once. Calling an individual “LGBT” has no meaning except except to erase.

    Many Lesbians are fed up with being made invisible by the alphabet soup of LGBT. As should be gay men. Why should Lesbian statistics be added, like some exotic herb sprinkled into the mix, only to evaporate and disappear.

    • Ben on May 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm

      I’m mostly using the alphabet soup in this op-ed because it’s the language that most people are familiar with. I agree that it is problematic. I personally prefer the term “queer liberation” and identify as “queer” because I think it’s more inclusive. But I recognize that a lot of folks are not familiar with or comfortable with that, as that term has been previously used as a pejorative.

      Some folks have even offered “gender and sexuality diversity” as an alternative. However, I reserve the right to continue utilizing “LGBTQ” until there is a consensus developed around an alternative terminology. If I utilized esoteric/inaccessible vocabulary or terminology, I would risk rendering the movement unintelligible to large swaths of people. So I’ve chosen to utilize the most accessible terminology.

  7. suzy on May 6, 2013 at 9:42 am

    No individual is “LGBT.” It is not possible to be all at once. Calling an individual “LGBT” has no meaning except except to erase.

    Many Lesbians are fed up with being made invisible by the alphabet soup of LGBT. As should be gay men. Why should Lesbian statistics be added, like some exotic herb sprinkled into the mix, only to evaporate and disappear.

    • Ben on May 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm

      I’m mostly using the alphabet soup in this op-ed because it’s the language that most people are familiar with. I agree that it is problematic. I personally prefer the term “queer liberation” and identify as “queer” because I think it’s more inclusive. But I recognize that a lot of folks are not familiar with or comfortable with that, as that term has been previously used as a pejorative.

      Some folks have even offered “gender and sexuality diversity” as an alternative. However, I reserve the right to continue utilizing “LGBTQ” until there is a consensus developed around an alternative terminology. If I utilized esoteric/inaccessible vocabulary or terminology, I would risk rendering the movement unintelligible to large swaths of people. So I’ve chosen to utilize the most accessible terminology.

  8. suzy on May 6, 2013 at 9:42 am

    No individual is “LGBT.” It is not possible to be all at once. Calling an individual “LGBT” has no meaning except except to erase.

    Many Lesbians are fed up with being made invisible by the alphabet soup of LGBT. As should be gay men. Why should Lesbian statistics be added, like some exotic herb sprinkled into the mix, only to evaporate and disappear.

    • Ben on May 7, 2013 at 1:07 pm

      I’m mostly using the alphabet soup in this op-ed because it’s the language that most people are familiar with. I agree that it is problematic. I personally prefer the term “queer liberation” and identify as “queer” because I think it’s more inclusive. But I recognize that a lot of folks are not familiar with or comfortable with that, as that term has been previously used as a pejorative.

      Some folks have even offered “gender and sexuality diversity” as an alternative. However, I reserve the right to continue utilizing “LGBTQ” until there is a consensus developed around an alternative terminology. If I utilized esoteric/inaccessible vocabulary or terminology, I would risk rendering the movement unintelligible to large swaths of people. So I’ve chosen to utilize the most accessible terminology.

  9. Recent News in LGBT 5/17/13 | Inter Section on May 17, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    [...] A Challenge to Mainstream LGBT Organizations [...]

  10. Recent News in LGBT 5/17/13 | Inter Section on May 17, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    [...] A Challenge to Mainstream LGBT Organizations [...]

  11. Recent News in LGBT 5/17/13 | Inter Section on May 17, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    [...] A Challenge to Mainstream LGBT Organizations [...]

  12. Recent News in LGBT 5/17/13 | Inter Section on May 17, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    [...] A Challenge to Mainstream LGBT Organizations [...]

Follow The Feminist Wire

Arts & Culture

  • 3 poems by Sarah Kortemeier SarahKortemeier-_Baby_Fever____Stone_with_Nineteen_Corners____The_-sarah_kortemeier_outdoor_color_by_jennifer_mcstotts

    The Mountain   The mountain is really a series of itself. Deeper pockets of sky color float in its canyons. In certain seasons, it’s difficult to tell rock face from snowfall. The ridge line looks much sharper than it must, in actuality, be. When you climb, the summit is sometimes [...]

  • 3 poems by Arielle Greenberg Wormwood portrait LA

    Who I’d Like to Meet   I am on tiptoe scanning our tallest bookshelves for something to pack to read on the plane.  I am scanful, tippy-toed: a girl without boots.  I am shorty.  I want to read something great, as in literary, and beautiful and daring, and something hobnailed [...]

  • From Corpses, Artworks and Dreams of by Raha Namy

    The novel Corpses, Arts and Dreams of is a triptych that hopes to tell the story/history of a people of a place and time, from three different angles, in three different styles. The first book deals with life in the city of Tehran. The second is on the people who [...]