The Perpetual Dumb Girl

December 6, 2012
By

By Erika L. Sánchez

Sometimes, when I have to walk past a group of teenage girls, I fear I’ll hear a version of the affected dumb girl voice. As I shuffle past, I cringe and shake my head like an old shrew. The way they stretch out every syllable is almost painful and my feminist inclination is to irrationally scream a phrase I’ve stolen from my friend:  Do you want to get pregnant or do you want to go to college?!

But really, what should I expect? Why should I be surprised if women have always been encouraged to play dumb?

The dumb girl trope is deeply ingrained in American culture and history. In the 1940s, postwar dating manuals even explicitly advised women to “play dumb” to catch a man and forty percent of college women admitted to doing this in a survey. And though this seems backwards and outdated, it’s still relevant to women today. The media has effectively maintained this trope decade after decade. Let’s count all the dumb blondes that have graced our TV screens over our lifetimes. And how many women of color have you seen on TV or film who were not bumbling caricatures?

The media can now target women earlier and more effectively than ever before. According to the documentary film Miss Representation, in one week American teenagers spend 31 hours watching TV, 17 hours listening to music, 3 hours watching movies, 4 hours reading magazines, and 10 hours online. That adds up to 10 hours and 45 minutes of media consumption a day. Teenagers are constantly bombarded with media, and the quality of what they consume will shape their sense of self. After watching hours and hours of Nickelodeon, even I would want to be iCarly.

Popular children’s channels such as Disney and Nickelodeon have the power to dictate and even create teen and tween culture in the United States. According to Nielsen data provided by Horizon Media, over the past year, Nickelodeon averaged 1.1 million daily viewers between the ages of 2 and 11. Disney averaged 978,000. This is especially troubling because teenagers are currently “the hottest consumer demographic in America.” At 33 million, they make up the largest generation of teens in American history, even larger than the Baby Boom generation. Last year, America’s teens spent $100 billion, while influencing their parents’ spending by $50 billion. This huge cultural and economic influence allows media to manufacture anti-feminist ideologies that are targeted to young girls. In JESSIE, for instance, a show about a small town Texas girl who moves to New York City and becomes a nanny to a celebrity couple’s four children, the children are depicted as much smarter than their bumbling 18-year-old nanny. Shake it Up, which revolves around two best friends who become professional dancers on a local show, depicts teenage girls as shallow, vain, and ditsy, perpetuating the notion that young women can be little more than cute or pretty.

Glorifying stupidity in girls is highly profitable because it means that these young consumers will focus their attention on their appearance. They will never be the most popular girl in school if they don’t have the latest doodad or lip gloss. Insecurity is lucrative. The media critic Mark Crispin Miller points out that advertising sells anxiety to the young. “It’s always telling them that they are not thin enough, they’re not pretty enough, they don’t have the right friends, or they have no friends…they’re losers unless they’re cool.” According to popular media, girls can only be “cool” if they’re pretty or sexy and desired by boys. I now see this anxiety begin very early on. I recently overheard a couple of six-year-olds ask each other if they were sexy. Did they really know what “sexy” meant? Had they just watched an episode of Glee? Do their parents watch Keeping up with the Kardashians? Or did they simply happen to hear that god-awful song “I’m Sexy and I Know it?”

Eventually, the “dumb girl” so prevalent in kids’ programming evolves into another version we now see on reality TV. The popularity of so many vapid reality stars illustrates this glorification of stupidity in women. Last year, Rutgers paid Snooki $32,000 to speak to undergrads, while Nobel and Pulitzer Prize-winning author Toni Morrison received $30,000 for her address at the school’s commencement. Kim Kardashian, a woman who’s created a career from inherited wealth, a sex tape, and a big ass has accumulated a net worth of $38 million dollars. And though the Kardashians may not actually be unintelligent, what they are manufacturing and perpetuating is stupidity. If young girls see these kinds of celebrities being rewarded with money and attention, why wouldn’t they imitate them? The Real Houswives franchise has also taken control of the somewhat older demographic by depicting middle-aged women as shallow, catty, greedy, and idle. Their fame, “success,” and identity are entirely dependent on the men they marry, and nearly every episode shows these women ripping each other to shreds over some frivolous transgression. It not only encourages pettiness, but also teaches girls that women can’t be friends.

But why the increase in anti-feminist TV? The article “Why Does Reality TV Present Women As Marriage Obsessed Bimbos?” by Jennifer L. Pozner points out that as women make groundbreaking political strides, the anti-feminist media increases. Reality television in particular “has emerged as America’s most vivid example of pop cultural backlash against women’s rights and social progress.” We’re constantly being distracted from women’s accomplishments with sexist fluff. Who cares about the accomplishments of the First Lady when black women are tearing out each others’ weaves on Basketball Wives?

Though women currently earn almost 60 percent of all bachelor’s degrees and more than half of master’s and Ph.D.s, this is not at all represented in the media. Women are pursuing higher education now more than ever, yet the amount of vapid women on TV and in the movies is startling. The only modern-day feminist on TV that I can even think of is Lisa Simpson, a cartoon.

I know not every teenage girl who feigns stupidity to appear cute and desirable will end up being like the catty and vacuous women we see on every TV channel. But the odds are against them. Encouraging or even allowing young women to defer to men by undermining their own capabilities at an early age is a disservice to them. If they pretend to be unintelligent, the line between reality and affectation will surely blur with time. If they base their identity on their appearance and sexual desirability, their mental health will continue to suffer as adults. According to the APA, evidence shows that sexualization negatively affects cognitive functioning, physical and mental health, and sexuality, attitudes, and beliefs. In The Lolita Effect: The Media Sexualization of Young Girls and What We Can Do About It, M. Gigi Durham also points out the influence the media can have on a young girl’s psyche: “’Hotness’ as an imperative belittles the value of intelligence, artistic ability, spiritual growth, political awareness, or indeed any other aspect of personality that could enrich girls’ lives and translate into potent adulthood.” I wonder what kind of adults those six-year-olds who wanted to be sexy will eventually become.

Though there has never been an abundance of strong female characters on TV or in film, negative portrayals of women are increasing at a frightening rate. The documentary Miss Representation reminds us that, “you can’t be what you can’t see.” Without representation of nuanced, smart, and independent women, I worry that girls will be discouraged from having the audacity to be unapologetically intelligent.

And why would they want to be smart when they only see sexiness being rewarded? How can they possibly develop the confidence to interrogate patriarchy as adults if they are discouraged from challenging boys when they are young? I wonder who will be the activists, politicians, and leaders of the next generation, because the farther feminism takes us, the more the media unravels our efforts. And every time we let this happen, we fail the next generation of women.

_________________________________________________

Erika L. Sánchez is a poet, feminist, and freelance writer living in Chicago. She graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Illinois at Chicago, was a recipient of a Fulbright Scholarship to Madrid, Spain, and holds an MFA in Creative Writing from the University of New Mexico. She is currently the sex and love advice columnist for Cosmopolitan for Latinas and a contributor for The Huffington Post, NBC Latino, and others. Her poetry has appeared in Pleiades, Drunken Boat, Witness, Anti-, Hunger Mountain, Crab Orchard Review, Hayden’s Ferry Review, Copper Nickel, and others. She has written book reviews for Kirkus Reviews and her nonfiction has been published in Jezebel, AlterNet, and Ms. Magazine. You can follow her on Facebook , Twitter, or erikalsanchez.com.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

20 Responses to The Perpetual Dumb Girl

  1. Veronica on December 6, 2012 at 11:27 am

    “Shake it Up, which revolves around two best friends who become professional dancers on a local show, depicts teenage girls as shallow, vain, and ditsy, perpetuating the notion that young women can be little more than cute or pretty.”

    While there are moments of this, you failed to note that Rocky is a straight A student who is often urging her ditzy partner, CeCe, to be a better student. Rocky struggles with the notion of being popular and smart/geek – see the ep where she ditches her lasar tag friends – but from what I have seen (oh, have I seen too much!) she ends up finding a way to embrace her nerd side & dance side. I do dislike how much of a ditz & selfish the show frames CeCe.

    What really gets my goat is that Disney will allow Rocky & other characters on the network to have feminist moments…but then walk them back from being full feminist characters. See the Shake it Up ep on beauty pageants.

    Otherwise, great piece.

  2. Veronica on December 6, 2012 at 11:27 am

    “Shake it Up, which revolves around two best friends who become professional dancers on a local show, depicts teenage girls as shallow, vain, and ditsy, perpetuating the notion that young women can be little more than cute or pretty.”

    While there are moments of this, you failed to note that Rocky is a straight A student who is often urging her ditzy partner, CeCe, to be a better student. Rocky struggles with the notion of being popular and smart/geek – see the ep where she ditches her lasar tag friends – but from what I have seen (oh, have I seen too much!) she ends up finding a way to embrace her nerd side & dance side. I do dislike how much of a ditz & selfish the show frames CeCe.

    What really gets my goat is that Disney will allow Rocky & other characters on the network to have feminist moments…but then walk them back from being full feminist characters. See the Shake it Up ep on beauty pageants.

    Otherwise, great piece.

  3. Veronica on December 6, 2012 at 11:27 am

    “Shake it Up, which revolves around two best friends who become professional dancers on a local show, depicts teenage girls as shallow, vain, and ditsy, perpetuating the notion that young women can be little more than cute or pretty.”

    While there are moments of this, you failed to note that Rocky is a straight A student who is often urging her ditzy partner, CeCe, to be a better student. Rocky struggles with the notion of being popular and smart/geek – see the ep where she ditches her lasar tag friends – but from what I have seen (oh, have I seen too much!) she ends up finding a way to embrace her nerd side & dance side. I do dislike how much of a ditz & selfish the show frames CeCe.

    What really gets my goat is that Disney will allow Rocky & other characters on the network to have feminist moments…but then walk them back from being full feminist characters. See the Shake it Up ep on beauty pageants.

    Otherwise, great piece.

  4. Veronica on December 6, 2012 at 11:27 am

    “Shake it Up, which revolves around two best friends who become professional dancers on a local show, depicts teenage girls as shallow, vain, and ditsy, perpetuating the notion that young women can be little more than cute or pretty.”

    While there are moments of this, you failed to note that Rocky is a straight A student who is often urging her ditzy partner, CeCe, to be a better student. Rocky struggles with the notion of being popular and smart/geek – see the ep where she ditches her lasar tag friends – but from what I have seen (oh, have I seen too much!) she ends up finding a way to embrace her nerd side & dance side. I do dislike how much of a ditz & selfish the show frames CeCe.

    What really gets my goat is that Disney will allow Rocky & other characters on the network to have feminist moments…but then walk them back from being full feminist characters. See the Shake it Up ep on beauty pageants.

    Otherwise, great piece.

  5. Jean Riquelme on December 7, 2012 at 11:06 am

    Excellent article as usual.
    I just want to point out, as someone who used to do publicity photos for a living, that your photo is a classic dumb girl pose, taken from above to make you look less smart, more vulnerable and give the veiwer a sense that they are more important than you.
    Full face on sister!

  6. Jean Riquelme on December 7, 2012 at 11:06 am

    Excellent article as usual.
    I just want to point out, as someone who used to do publicity photos for a living, that your photo is a classic dumb girl pose, taken from above to make you look less smart, more vulnerable and give the veiwer a sense that they are more important than you.
    Full face on sister!

  7. Jean Riquelme on December 7, 2012 at 11:06 am

    Excellent article as usual.
    I just want to point out, as someone who used to do publicity photos for a living, that your photo is a classic dumb girl pose, taken from above to make you look less smart, more vulnerable and give the veiwer a sense that they are more important than you.
    Full face on sister!

  8. Jean Riquelme on December 7, 2012 at 11:06 am

    Excellent article as usual.
    I just want to point out, as someone who used to do publicity photos for a living, that your photo is a classic dumb girl pose, taken from above to make you look less smart, more vulnerable and give the veiwer a sense that they are more important than you.
    Full face on sister!

  9. John on December 7, 2012 at 4:03 pm

    Interesting that from my perspective entertainment media is full of examples of “woman/wife is smart, bold, always correct, attractive : man/husband is dumb, lazy, always wrong (wife has to set him straight!), fat”.

    This is what a whole generation of boys has grown up with. I don’t think that’s very healthy and I do think we should be concerned that the percentage of bachelors degrees isn’t closer to 50/50.

    Both issues should be countered with good parenting. I don’t think the “dumb girl” stereotype is any worse than the stereotypes entertainment media uses for men and boys though. It comes down to laziness on the part of producers/writers/and executives.

    Also the above poster has just about the dumbest comments about your picture that I could imagine. You don’t look dumb, less smart, or vulnerable. I certainly didn’t see it and think, “Gosh, I sure am a lot more important than her since her photo is taken from an angle!” I prefer my own photos taken from a higher angle. “Full face” is not a good look for many.

  10. John on December 7, 2012 at 4:03 pm

    Interesting that from my perspective entertainment media is full of examples of “woman/wife is smart, bold, always correct, attractive : man/husband is dumb, lazy, always wrong (wife has to set him straight!), fat”.

    This is what a whole generation of boys has grown up with. I don’t think that’s very healthy and I do think we should be concerned that the percentage of bachelors degrees isn’t closer to 50/50.

    Both issues should be countered with good parenting. I don’t think the “dumb girl” stereotype is any worse than the stereotypes entertainment media uses for men and boys though. It comes down to laziness on the part of producers/writers/and executives.

    Also the above poster has just about the dumbest comments about your picture that I could imagine. You don’t look dumb, less smart, or vulnerable. I certainly didn’t see it and think, “Gosh, I sure am a lot more important than her since her photo is taken from an angle!” I prefer my own photos taken from a higher angle. “Full face” is not a good look for many.

  11. John on December 7, 2012 at 4:03 pm

    Interesting that from my perspective entertainment media is full of examples of “woman/wife is smart, bold, always correct, attractive : man/husband is dumb, lazy, always wrong (wife has to set him straight!), fat”.

    This is what a whole generation of boys has grown up with. I don’t think that’s very healthy and I do think we should be concerned that the percentage of bachelors degrees isn’t closer to 50/50.

    Both issues should be countered with good parenting. I don’t think the “dumb girl” stereotype is any worse than the stereotypes entertainment media uses for men and boys though. It comes down to laziness on the part of producers/writers/and executives.

    Also the above poster has just about the dumbest comments about your picture that I could imagine. You don’t look dumb, less smart, or vulnerable. I certainly didn’t see it and think, “Gosh, I sure am a lot more important than her since her photo is taken from an angle!” I prefer my own photos taken from a higher angle. “Full face” is not a good look for many.

  12. John on December 7, 2012 at 4:03 pm

    Interesting that from my perspective entertainment media is full of examples of “woman/wife is smart, bold, always correct, attractive : man/husband is dumb, lazy, always wrong (wife has to set him straight!), fat”.

    This is what a whole generation of boys has grown up with. I don’t think that’s very healthy and I do think we should be concerned that the percentage of bachelors degrees isn’t closer to 50/50.

    Both issues should be countered with good parenting. I don’t think the “dumb girl” stereotype is any worse than the stereotypes entertainment media uses for men and boys though. It comes down to laziness on the part of producers/writers/and executives.

    Also the above poster has just about the dumbest comments about your picture that I could imagine. You don’t look dumb, less smart, or vulnerable. I certainly didn’t see it and think, “Gosh, I sure am a lot more important than her since her photo is taken from an angle!” I prefer my own photos taken from a higher angle. “Full face” is not a good look for many.

  13. Anita on December 15, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    While I agree with most of your article, I can’t stand when educated women are dismissive of women who have an “affected dumb girl” voice. I am a master’s student but I also use the word “like” all the time, my thoughts aren’t always coherent and I like to reference pop culture when making analogies but that isn’t for show, that’s how I speak. And because of that I get treated as unintelligent. There is a bit of sexism, classism, racism and an impostor phenomenon going on here (within the realm of graduate studies). So the question is, can I love Khloe Kardashian and still be an intelligent feminist? Damn straight I can.

  14. Anita on December 15, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    While I agree with most of your article, I can’t stand when educated women are dismissive of women who have an “affected dumb girl” voice. I am a master’s student but I also use the word “like” all the time, my thoughts aren’t always coherent and I like to reference pop culture when making analogies but that isn’t for show, that’s how I speak. And because of that I get treated as unintelligent. There is a bit of sexism, classism, racism and an impostor phenomenon going on here (within the realm of graduate studies). So the question is, can I love Khloe Kardashian and still be an intelligent feminist? Damn straight I can.

  15. Anita on December 15, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    While I agree with most of your article, I can’t stand when educated women are dismissive of women who have an “affected dumb girl” voice. I am a master’s student but I also use the word “like” all the time, my thoughts aren’t always coherent and I like to reference pop culture when making analogies but that isn’t for show, that’s how I speak. And because of that I get treated as unintelligent. There is a bit of sexism, classism, racism and an impostor phenomenon going on here (within the realm of graduate studies). So the question is, can I love Khloe Kardashian and still be an intelligent feminist? Damn straight I can.

  16. Anita on December 15, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    While I agree with most of your article, I can’t stand when educated women are dismissive of women who have an “affected dumb girl” voice. I am a master’s student but I also use the word “like” all the time, my thoughts aren’t always coherent and I like to reference pop culture when making analogies but that isn’t for show, that’s how I speak. And because of that I get treated as unintelligent. There is a bit of sexism, classism, racism and an impostor phenomenon going on here (within the realm of graduate studies). So the question is, can I love Khloe Kardashian and still be an intelligent feminist? Damn straight I can.

  17. TedSimon on December 16, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    although I am more than bugged by that annoying “stupid” girl facade some girls realize can get them attention, I can more than comfortably say that there are just as many boys in the high school I just got out of who were taught to act the same way

  18. TedSimon on December 16, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    although I am more than bugged by that annoying “stupid” girl facade some girls realize can get them attention, I can more than comfortably say that there are just as many boys in the high school I just got out of who were taught to act the same way

  19. TedSimon on December 16, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    although I am more than bugged by that annoying “stupid” girl facade some girls realize can get them attention, I can more than comfortably say that there are just as many boys in the high school I just got out of who were taught to act the same way

  20. TedSimon on December 16, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    although I am more than bugged by that annoying “stupid” girl facade some girls realize can get them attention, I can more than comfortably say that there are just as many boys in the high school I just got out of who were taught to act the same way

Follow The Feminist Wire

Arts & Culture

  • Poems by Lisa Ciccarello bio pic fw

    from & if I die, make me how you are     It is the sister inside him that makes him slow.   She writes the psalm he tries to hold her back.   The blade is a proposal: how I stayed inside my sister’s voice.  . . . . [...]

  • Two Poems by Tsitsi Jaji tumblr_m0jjzqsYiq1qbh27fo1_500

    By Tsitsi Jaji   Pause. (For All the Madibas)*   There is a breath before the pendulum rends its center, A breath before what leapt comes back to its ground.     There, men and women in chains broke rock, forcing it to deliver         .   [...]

  • Fiction Feature: from “Kill Marguerite,” by Megan Milks Milks-avatar-magicked-out

    By Megan Milks   This excerpt from the short story “Kill Marguerite” takes place after the protagonist, Caty, has already beat Level One and killed Marguerite, her arch-enemy.   Level Two: The Trampoline     BEGIN>> The trampoline is this big old trampoline in Matt and Curtis Wheeler’s backyard, and [...]