What Does Democracy Look Like?

October 24, 2012
By

I’m feeling very ambivalent about voting and electoral politics more generally these days. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that I’m ineligible to vote in the United States and I’m also ineligible to vote in my home country of Canada. In effect, my itinerant life has left me disfranchised both where I live and where I grew up. Of course, my disfranchisement is much more a sign of my own privilege than marginalization: my ability to move to another country to study for a PhD and to work in a middle-class profession abroad.

There are far more sinister and sweeping forms of disfranchisement at work in the United States today, including the stripping of voting rights from those with felony convictions and from those without “proper” identification under the new voter registration laws. According to The Sentencing Project:

Nationally, an estimated 5.85 million Americans are denied the right to vote because of laws that prohibit voting by people with felony convictions. Felony disenfranchisement is an obstacle to participation in democratic life which is exacerbated by racial disparities in the criminal justice system, resulting in 1 of every 13 African Americans unable to vote.

Although the voter ID laws have been pitched as a means to minimize “voter fraud,” they will have a disproportionate impact on the poor, African Americans, the elderly, students and people with disabilities. This is not what democracy looks like.

So, why vote at all? Although this question seems to be an anathema to all good liberals, I’ve heard this question from students, from friends in the social media sphere, and from the numerous people I’ve spoken to throughout my travels promoting my new book. I’ve thought long and hard about this question. After all, despite the mind-numbing hours upon hours of discussions, debates, and analyses in the lead-up to this year’s election, our two main candidates have, for the most part, failed to address some of the biggest bread-and-butter issues facing a growing proportion of the U.S. population (particularly people of color and their children) struggling under the weight of foreclosures, joblessness, underemployment and the attack on unions, food insecurity and the inaccessibility of healthy choices, the underinvestment in truly public education, poor quality health care and a lack of affordable health insurance for all, poverty and destitution, homelessness, mass incarceration, police brutality, the stripping of reproductive rights, the lack of sensible and humane immigration policies, and the list goes on. (And on the foreign policy front, the United States’ continued military interventions and neoliberal bullying abroad and their real human costs.) Seriously now, enough of the fake pandering to the “middle class”! To me, it makes perfect sense why so many Americans are not so hot to race to the polls on Election Day.

I’ve had to stop watching the presidential debates because they tend to raise my blood pressure without providing me with any new information. I started to feel as if the debates (and the presidential campaigns more generally) were an elaborate and over-produced exercise in “wag the dog.” They have become what I call “People Magazine-ified,” more tabloid than actual news. Campaigning has become an industry unto itself, as candidates sell themselves to voter-consumers and campaign managers rely on sophisticated polling data akin to market research. We are being encouraged to fight over which party’s (and their well-heeled backers’) scraps we would prefer to catch, while inequality on a number of fronts continues to deepen. This might seem like hyperbole to some, but I can’t shake the feeling that we are losing sight of the larger picture in focusing on things as mundane as the candidates’ body language and “likeability.”

That said, I do think that the practice of voting still matters, even in the United States’ two-party system complete with an ossified Electoral College. If it didn’t matter then there would not be such a concerted effort (particularly on the Right) to keep certain people from voting. However, at a time when many view voting as a form of consumption – as an end in itself – we seem to have forgotten what role voting actually plays in our political system.

We only need to look back to the days when black Americans in the South were fighting for the basic right to vote to see that we need to foster and participate in political action that takes place outside the narrow forum of electoral politics. The likes of Septima Clark, Ella Baker, and Fannie Lou Hamer (and so many others) always understood that voting was just one strategy of many. Voting was just the beginning. They worked to cultivate grassroots leaders to collectively push for change in their communities from the bottom up. They knew that politicians would only do what their constituents forced them to do. They had to come up with their own visions of what freedom and equality meant to them. They had to advance their own ideas of what kind of world they would like to create because no political party factored them into its platform. They organized citizenship schools, took to the streets, led sit-ins and other direct-action campaigns, supported workers’ rights, created farming cooperatives, etc., in order to make their own change. Now at a moment when big-money interests have grabbed control of electoral politics in the United States, these earlier models have renewed applicability. We are not powerless. Clark, Baker, Hamer, and other visionary black women have already shown us what democracy looks like.

Tags: , , , ,

8 Responses to What Does Democracy Look Like?

  1. Fanon Che Wilkins on October 24, 2012 at 6:44 am

    I could not agree with you more. Voting is part of a political strategy, one tool in the box of many that needs to be employed at strategic moments when it matters. As critical as I am of Obama (and man did I cringe hearing him talk about Drone attacks in the Middle East and North Africa)–he is the alternative to Romney. Meanwhile the left needs to (yes its a broken record) organize and work to create the alternatives we want to see. Thank you for this wonderful piece:)

  2. Fanon Che Wilkins on October 24, 2012 at 6:44 am

    I could not agree with you more. Voting is part of a political strategy, one tool in the box of many that needs to be employed at strategic moments when it matters. As critical as I am of Obama (and man did I cringe hearing him talk about Drone attacks in the Middle East and North Africa)–he is the alternative to Romney. Meanwhile the left needs to (yes its a broken record) organize and work to create the alternatives we want to see. Thank you for this wonderful piece:)

  3. Fanon Che Wilkins on October 24, 2012 at 6:44 am

    I could not agree with you more. Voting is part of a political strategy, one tool in the box of many that needs to be employed at strategic moments when it matters. As critical as I am of Obama (and man did I cringe hearing him talk about Drone attacks in the Middle East and North Africa)–he is the alternative to Romney. Meanwhile the left needs to (yes its a broken record) organize and work to create the alternatives we want to see. Thank you for this wonderful piece:)

  4. Fanon Che Wilkins on October 24, 2012 at 6:44 am

    I could not agree with you more. Voting is part of a political strategy, one tool in the box of many that needs to be employed at strategic moments when it matters. As critical as I am of Obama (and man did I cringe hearing him talk about Drone attacks in the Middle East and North Africa)–he is the alternative to Romney. Meanwhile the left needs to (yes its a broken record) organize and work to create the alternatives we want to see. Thank you for this wonderful piece:)

  5. Josh on October 24, 2012 at 7:36 am

    How can you speak of voter id laws as some kind of civil injustice, only to turn around and praise the actions of the civil rights movement. The people of the civil rights movement were not allowed to vote. They fought throught the worst of bigotry with an unrelenting determination to attain their American right. These people are being asked to SHOW VALID IDENTIFICATION!!! That costs about 20 dollars!!! And lasts for 2 years!!! I might suggest also spending a little less time in a thesaurus and a little more in unbias world new. Big words dont disguise a completely unrealistic world view

  6. Josh on October 24, 2012 at 7:36 am

    How can you speak of voter id laws as some kind of civil injustice, only to turn around and praise the actions of the civil rights movement. The people of the civil rights movement were not allowed to vote. They fought throught the worst of bigotry with an unrelenting determination to attain their American right. These people are being asked to SHOW VALID IDENTIFICATION!!! That costs about 20 dollars!!! And lasts for 2 years!!! I might suggest also spending a little less time in a thesaurus and a little more in unbias world new. Big words dont disguise a completely unrealistic world view

  7. Josh on October 24, 2012 at 7:36 am

    How can you speak of voter id laws as some kind of civil injustice, only to turn around and praise the actions of the civil rights movement. The people of the civil rights movement were not allowed to vote. They fought throught the worst of bigotry with an unrelenting determination to attain their American right. These people are being asked to SHOW VALID IDENTIFICATION!!! That costs about 20 dollars!!! And lasts for 2 years!!! I might suggest also spending a little less time in a thesaurus and a little more in unbias world new. Big words dont disguise a completely unrealistic world view

  8. Josh on October 24, 2012 at 7:36 am

    How can you speak of voter id laws as some kind of civil injustice, only to turn around and praise the actions of the civil rights movement. The people of the civil rights movement were not allowed to vote. They fought throught the worst of bigotry with an unrelenting determination to attain their American right. These people are being asked to SHOW VALID IDENTIFICATION!!! That costs about 20 dollars!!! And lasts for 2 years!!! I might suggest also spending a little less time in a thesaurus and a little more in unbias world new. Big words dont disguise a completely unrealistic world view

Follow The Feminist Wire

Arts & Culture

  • Two Poems by Tsitsi Jaji tumblr_m0jjzqsYiq1qbh27fo1_500

    By Tsitsi Jaji   Pause. (For All the Madibas)*   There is a breath before the pendulum rends its center, A breath before what leapt comes back to its ground.     There, men and women in chains broke rock, forcing it to deliver         .   [...]

  • Fiction Feature: from “Kill Marguerite,” by Megan Milks Milks-avatar-magicked-out

    By Megan Milks   This excerpt from the short story “Kill Marguerite” takes place after the protagonist, Caty, has already beat Level One and killed Marguerite, her arch-enemy.   Level Two: The Trampoline     BEGIN>> The trampoline is this big old trampoline in Matt and Curtis Wheeler’s backyard, and [...]

  • Video Feature: List of Demands: Because Existing is a Privilege by Nicole Shantè White nicole white photo

    By Nicole Shantè  White   This creative visual addresses queer invisibility by encompassing the intricacies of the Gay Liberation manifesto and the Black Panther Party’s manifesto. Originally inspired by Sofia Snow’s “List of Demands: Because Existing is a Privilege, emerging author Nicole Shantè White uses the bed as a metaphor [...]