Anti-abortion doctors could legally lie in Arizona

March 10, 2012
By

The Arizona Senate has has approved legislation that will let doctors lie about an unborn child’s health and escape any related “wrongful birth” suits, which has some saying the state is trying to trick expecting parents from opting for abortion. Arizona senators have called for a law that will, if passed, eliminate malpractice suits that are brought on by families that believe doctors willingly withheld information about their unborn children. In instances across the state, some families have sued physicians after giving birth to children with disabilities and handicaps that they believe doctors were aware of before delivery. Some state residents have waged lawsuits based on allegations that physicians were not clear with crucial information which, had the parents been privy to, could have led them to consider abortion.

If the new law is passed, doctors would not be liable in these cases for failing to make clear any and all risks the unborn child faces. Specifically, Arizona Senate Bill 1359 relieves a defendant of liability for damages in a suit “based on a claim that, but for an act or omission of the defendant, a child or children would not or should not have been born.”

Read more: RT.com

Tags: , , , ,

4 Responses to Anti-abortion doctors could legally lie in Arizona

  1. robert kleinman on March 10, 2012 at 11:26 am

    Even if it is "legal", it is still unethical. A woman should then be able to complain to the Board of Medical examiners and that doctor would then be disciplined. The discipline, IMO, would be loss of license for such a willful and unethical breach of ethics. I don't understand how doctors could let this law stand.

  2. robert kleinman on March 10, 2012 at 11:26 am

    Even if it is "legal", it is still unethical. A woman should then be able to complain to the Board of Medical examiners and that doctor would then be disciplined. The discipline, IMO, would be loss of license for such a willful and unethical breach of ethics. I don't understand how doctors could let this law stand.

  3. robert kleinman on March 10, 2012 at 11:26 am

    Even if it is "legal", it is still unethical. A woman should then be able to complain to the Board of Medical examiners and that doctor would then be disciplined. The discipline, IMO, would be loss of license for such a willful and unethical breach of ethics. I don't understand how doctors could let this law stand.

  4. robert kleinman on March 10, 2012 at 11:26 am

    Even if it is "legal", it is still unethical. A woman should then be able to complain to the Board of Medical examiners and that doctor would then be disciplined. The discipline, IMO, would be loss of license for such a willful and unethical breach of ethics. I don't understand how doctors could let this law stand.

Follow The Feminist Wire

Arts & Culture

  • “Paws” by Tracy Burkholder tracy

    Paws   In sixth grade, I started to envy certain girls’ hands. Not always manicured, but always neat. Fingers thin and smooth. These hands gently freed sheets of paper from their metal spirals and lifted loops of hair to more beautiful perches. Lunch trays floated inside their gentle grip while [...]

  • 3 Poems by Holly Mitchell holly

    Slipping Under   Like a ghost, I prepare a bath behind a door   that hasn’t locked long as I remember.   When my mother or grandmother knocks at the open door,   I obscure what they call my “new breasts” under the soap water   and focus on the [...]

  • Excerpts from Damnation by Janice Lee janice

    CONFESSION Sometimes one willingly enters a dark and empty space, the creaking of the loose boards below, the phantom moonlight above. · I had a dream that I was carrying a wounded deer in my arms. He lay there limp, depending on me completely and solely for the permission to [...]